05

Kyle's five博後五問

On 24 October our plant advisor sent two research highlights and five questions. Treat the memo as a reviewer's opening move: anything he asks, a judge can ask, and he asks harder. 10 月 24 日,植物指導老師寄來兩個研究亮點與五個問題。把這份備忘錄當成審稿人的第一手棋:他問得出來的,評審也問得出來,而且他問得更狠。

Read this first. His memo is one tier stronger than our data at every point. He is describing a direction of travel; our wiki is describing a standard of evidence. If a judge puts the two side by side, say exactly that — do not disown the advisor and do not upgrade the data. 先讀這段。他的備忘錄在每一點上都比我們的資料強一階。他描述的是前進的方向,我們的 wiki 描述的是證據的標準。如果評審把兩份擺在一起,就照這樣講——不要撇清老師,也不要把資料升級。

The two highlights兩個亮點

What he wants us to lead with — and exactly how far each one can be taken.他希望我們主打的東西——以及每一個到底能推到哪裡。

The five questions五個問題

Each one is unpacked into what he is really asking, the moves, and the gap to name out loud.每一題都拆成:他真正在問什麼、怎麼答、以及要主動講出來的缺口。